displayNone
displayNone

Accessibility Menu

banner

NAAC C2 Chapter-2

2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7
2.1.1 | 2.1.2 | 2.2.1 | 2.2.2 | 2.3.1 | 2.3.2 | 2.3.3 | 2.4.1 | 2.4.2 | 2.4.3 | 2.4.4 | 2.5.1 | 2.5.2 | 2.5.3 | 2.5.4 | 2.6.1 | 2.6.2 | 2.6.3 | 2.7.1

2.1 Student Enrollment and Profile

2.1.1 Demand Ratio (Average of Last five years)

2.1.1.1 Number of seats available year-wise during the last five years

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
760 692 602 570 554
File Description Document
Demand Ratio (Average of Last five years) based on Data Template upload the document View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (Excluding Supernumerary Seats)

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
132 120 123 100 97
File Description Document
Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved (Data Template) View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners.

The Institute has a system in place to assess advanced learners and slow learners.

Advanced Learners & Slow Learners
Read More

File Description Document
Upload Any additional information View Document
Paste link for additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • Any additional information: Summer Time Table
    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

2.2.2 Student - Full Time Teacher Ratio

28:1

File Description Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.3 Teaching – Learning Process

2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing their learning experiences.

The institute believes that teaching courses not only imparts knowledge to the students, but is also a way for the faculty members to explore new areas. In order to make course student centric, the course instructor adopts the following in teaching-learning and assessment mechanism:

  • Project based learning
  • Assignments, Quizzes, and Lab practices
  • Peer discussion
  • Project and presentation

Read More

File Description Document
Upload any additional information View Document
Link for Additional Information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.3.2 Teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes

Being an ICT focussed institute proactively uses the latest ICT-enabled tools for its academic and research activities. All the faculty members use ICT tools, in one form or the other, to teach and train the students. Faculty use LCD projectors, document cameras, laptops/desktops, smart pen tabs, video conferencing, printers, photocopiers, Pen Drives, scanners, microphones, and other e-learning tools to enhance the quality of teaching and learning. Read More

File Description Document
Upload any additional information View Document
Provide link for webpage describing the " LMS/ Academic management system" View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.3.3 Ratio of students mentored for academic and other related issues

33:1

Student mentoring is an integral part of academic excellence. Faculty mentor students for their academic performance, projects, research, and course related aspects. The institute has employed two counsellors who provide mentorship to students as and when they want for their stress, time management. The student clubs are very vibrant in the campus, which encourage students for their co-curricular and extracurricular activities. Finally, Undergraduate and Postgraduate program committees continuously monitor and mentor students who are put on academic probation and might be facing issues pertaining to their academics.

All projects (BTP, MTP, MSC-IT project, MSc-DS project, MDes project, Thesis) in the programs are being supervised/mentored by faculty.

File Description Document
Upload year wise, number of students enrolled and full time teachers on roll. View Document
mentor/mentee ratio View Document
Circulars pertaining to assigning mentors to mentees View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • List of mentor and mentee: Weblink
  • Circulars pertaining to assigning mentors to mentees: Weblink
  • Mentors Report: Weblink
  • Mentor-Mentee Ratio: Weblink

2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts during the last five years

86.36

File Description Document
Year wise full time teachers and sanctioned posts for 5 years View Document
List of the faculty members authenticated by the Head of HEI View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit. during the last five years

2.4.2.1 Number of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit.year-wise during the last five years

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
72 65 58 58 51
File Description Document
List of number of full time teachers with Ph D/D M/M Ch/D N B Superspeciality/DSc/D Lit and number of full time teachers for 5 years View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • List of number of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Super speciality/D.Sc./D’Lit and number of full time teachers for 5 years: Weblink
  • Year wise list: 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22
  • PhD Certificates of the faculties: Weblink

2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution

8.26 Years

2.4.3.1 Total experience of full-time teachers:
611 years

File Description Document
List of Teachers including their PAN, designation, dept and experience details View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • Certificate from the head of HEI: Weblink

2.4.4 Average percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at the State, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the last five years

2.4.4.1 Number of full time teachers who have received awards from state /national /international level from Government/Govt. recognized bodies year- wise during the last five years

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
11 7 7 4 3
File Description Document
Institutional data in prescribed format View Document
e-copies of award letters (scanned or soft copy) View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • Institutional data in prescribed format: Weblink
  • E-copies of award letters:
    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years

2.5.1.1 Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results year-wise during the last five years

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
10 11 11 13 10
File Description Document
List of Programmes and date of last semester and date of declaration of results View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • List of Programmes and date of last semester and date of declaration of results: Weblink
  • Exam Summary: Weblink
  • Academic Calender - 2017-18 to 2021-22: Weblink

2.5.2 Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years

2.5.2.1 Number of complaints/grievances about evaluation year-wise during the last five years

2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18
9 12 11 14 14
File Description Document
Number of complaints and total number of students appeared year wise View Document
Any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • Number of complaints and total number of students appeared year wise: Weblink
  • Certificate of CoE: TBU

2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution

The Controller of Examination (CoE) office is handling the examinations of the institute.

  • Question Paper Upload System (QPUS)
  • Depository of Question Papers or Question Banks (DQP/QB)
  • Examination Schedule Generator (ESG) Weblink

Read More

File Description Document
Year wise number of applications, students and revaluation cases View Document
Any additional information View Document
Link for additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes: Weblink
  • Year wise number of applications, students and revaluation cases: Weblink
  • Exam Schedules: Weblink

2.5.4 Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual

Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing

File Description Document
Current manual of examination automation system and Annual reports of examination including the present status of automation View Document
Current Manual of examination automation system View Document
Any additional information View Document
Annual reports of examination including the present status of automation View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and programme specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents

All academic programmes’ objectives and learning outcomes are clearly stated on the Institute’s website under the respective academic programmes. Furthermore, the learning outcomes of each course are a part of the course outline, and these are specified on the course file shared with students and available in the Lecture subfolder in the intranet. Read More

File Description Document
Upload COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary) View Document
Upload any additional information View Document
Paste link for Additional Information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.6.2 Attainment of Programme Outcomes, Programme Specific Outcomes and Course Outcomes are evaluated by the institution

  • Attainment of the Programme Outcomes
  • Attainment of the Programme Specific Outcomes
  • Attainment of the Course Outcomes

Read More

File Description Document
Upload any additional information View Document
Paste link for Additional Information View Document

Supporting Documents:

2.6.3 Pass percentage of students (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)

98.6 %

2.6.3.1 Total number of final year students who passed the examination conducted by Institution
563

2.6.3.2 Total number of final year students who appeared for the examination conducted by Institution
571

File Description Document
Upload list of Programmes and number of students passed and appeared in the final year examination View Document
Upload any additional information View Document
Paste link for the annual report View Document
Link fo any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • list of Programmes and number of students passed and appeared in the final year examination: Weblink
  • Annual reports of examination: Weblink

2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

2.7.1 Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process.

Yes, the institute conducts a structured student satisfaction survey for the following two exercises:

  • Course evaluation at the end of every semester for which a student has registered for the semester. This survey captures students’ understanding about the subject, instructor’s interaction and content delivery mechanism and overall course outcomes. The survey collects students’ feedback in an anonymous form, so that students can share their views without any fear and anxiety. After collecting the course evaluation survey, Dean-AP analyzes feedback and takes note of underperforming courses, if any, and shares the same with the Director. Dean-AP also shares the overall views of the said courses with the concerned instructors that helps in improvement of teaching-learning mechanism. For certain cases, the course instructor is altered for such courses that gathered poor feedback from students.
  • Exit feedback at the end of the final semester for which a student has registered for the program. This survey captures students feedback on curricular aspects, extracurricular activities, and experience about their campus lives. The survey is collected online, analyzed and necessary corrective measures taken up by concerned offices.
File Description Document
Upload database of all currently enrolled students View Document
Upload any additional information View Document

Supporting Documents:

  • List of students currently enrolled in all programmes: Weblink
Back to Top